Legal Opinion

United States v. City of Columbus

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided December 3, 1943No. Civ. No. 207PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

VOGEL, District Judge.

The United States of America, plaintiff herein, by its complaint seeks to recover from the City of Columbus, a municipal corporation, defendant, the sum of $3,729.-90, which is the amount expended by the plaintiff for cost of materials and labor in the construction of a WPA project located in the City of Columbus. The basis of plaintiff’s cause of action is:

“That this Defendant, without the knowledge of the Works Progress Administration, and contrary to and in violation of the Emergency Relief- Appropriation Act of 1937, and the rules and regulations issued thereunder,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hoover v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  2. Shelton v. City of GreenevilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Todaro v. City of ShreveportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Block v. SassamanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1939
  5. Taylor v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lakeville (Village) v. Conneaut (City)Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API