Legal Opinion

Ballinger v. Delta Loan & Finance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Prewitt

The question presented in this case is whether the City Motor Sales was released on the Conditional Sales Contracts, which it had assigned to Delta Loan and Finance Company on account of the fact that the plaintiff, Delta Loan and Finance Company did not advertise and sell the automobiles in question in compliance with Code Sections 7287 and 7291 respectively.

Both lower courts found in favor of the plaintiff and held that after the plaintiff had repossessed the cars in question it offered to turn over the cars to the defendant City Motor Sales, the conditional vendor for sale, and the latter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commerce Union Bank v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
  2. Wright v. Batchelor Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926
  3. Commercial Credit Co. v. McConkeyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hofler v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Personal Loan & Finance Co. v. KinninCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966
  3. Security Mutual Finance Corp. v. WalkerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API