Legal Opinion
McDonnell v. Commonwealth, Insurance Department
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 28, 1986No. Appeal, No. 2627 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Colins,
■' Michael and Ellen McDonnell (petitioners) were given notice by Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna) that .their automobile insurance policy would not'.b.e renewed because there had been two (2) accidents within thirty-six (36) months of the policy’s anniversary date. Both accidents involved petitioners ’ sixteen year old son.. petitioners filed a request for review with the Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Commissioner) pursuant to Section 1008.8. *383of The Insurance Department Act of 1921 (Act), Act of June 5, 1968, P.L. 140, as amended,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re Appeal of TabasCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Fioravanti v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
3Cited by14 opinions
- McDermond v. FosterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Kramer v. Department of InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- BG Balmer & Co. v. COM. OF PA., INS. COMM.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Commonwealth, Department of InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Hallowell v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.