Legal Opinion

Kocak v. Egert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 13, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered on or about August 31, 1999, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiffs’ motion for leave to serve an amended complaint in this legal malpractice action, with leave to renew upon submission of a further amended complaint consistent with the court’s decision, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, the motion granted and the further amended complaint is deemed served and filed with leave to defendants to answer not later than 20 days from the date of this order.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Empire-Ore, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Barbour v. Hospital for Special SurgeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. IMO Industries Inc. v. Anderson Kill & Olick, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Silvin v. KarwoskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mandel, Resnik & Kaiser, P.C. v. E.I. Electronics, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Lappin v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. International Shoppes, Inc. v. SpencerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Board of Managers of 60 Greene Condominium v. Acacia SoHo, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API