Legal Opinion

Wright v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 6, 1928No. 5310PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

This was an action to collect premiums on a receiver’s bond. It was brought by the appellee surety company against appellant, who was receiver in a suit in a state court. The defense was that the court which appointed the receiver entered an order terminating the surety’s liability on the bond before any of the premiums sued for became due.

The facts are not in dispute. On January 25, 1923, appellant was appointed receiver, his appointment to take effect upon his giving bond in the sum of $500,000, conditioned “as required by law.” On the next day appellant gave bond for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Bonding Co. v. HallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Armstrong v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FelderMississippi Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  2. Fidelity And Deposit Company Of Maryland v. Mary W. RussellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API