State v. Radan
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Kurtz, A.C.J.
RCW 9.41.040 prohibits any person convicted of a felony from possessing a firearm. However, a person cannot be precluded from possession of a firearm if the predicate conviction has been the subject of a postconviction procedure based on a finding of rehabilitation or innocence under RCW 9.41.040(3). Richard A. Radan was charged with second degree unlawful possession of a firearm based on a prior felony conviction in Montana. The trial court dismissed the unlawful possession charge, concluding that Mr. Radan could not be prohibited from possessing a firearm in Washington when his…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Beecham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Cherry v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Morris v. BlakerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Human Rights Commission v. Cheney School District No. 30Washington Supreme Court · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. FryWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. FryWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. RadanWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. RadanWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Landberg v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.