Legal Opinion

State v. Radan

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 28, 1999No. 17380-1-IIIPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kurtz, A.C.J.

RCW 9.41.040 prohibits any person convicted of a felony from possessing a firearm. However, a person cannot be precluded from possession of a firearm if the predicate conviction has been the subject of a postconviction procedure based on a finding of rehabilitation or innocence under RCW 9.41.040(3). Richard A. Radan was charged with second degree unlawful possession of a firearm based on a prior felony conviction in Montana. The trial court dismissed the unlawful possession charge, concluding that Mr. Radan could not be prohibited from possessing a firearm in Washington when his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Beecham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Cherry v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Morris v. BlakerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Human Rights Commission v. Cheney School District No. 30Washington Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. FryWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. FryWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. RadanWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. RadanWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Landberg v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API