Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Penndel Company

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 1997No. 778PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cox, Judge.

This matter presents a timely appeal from a decision rendered by the Monroe County Common Pleas Court on an amended complaint for declaratory judgment, whereby the trial court found that plaintiffs-appellants, Alma Coleman et al., did not prove all the essential elements of adverse possession or, alternatively, prescriptive easement against defendants-appellees, Penndel Company et al.

On September 29, 1995, appellants, Alma and Bernard Coleman, brought a complaint for declaratory judgment against appellees, Penndel Company and Westbank Harbor Services, over a disputed parcel of real…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. J. F. Gioia, Inc. v. Cardinal American Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. State ex rel. Pizza v. StropeOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Goldberger v. Bexley PropertiesOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hindall v. MartinezOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Kimball v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Harris v. Dayton Power & Light Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Harris v. Dayton Power & Light Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Wood v. Village of KiptonOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Gulas v. TironeOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Eac Properties v. Hall, 08ap-251 (12-2-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API