Legal Opinion

People v. Archer

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1989No. Docket Nos. D007494, D009410PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TODD, J.

A jury found James Henderson Archer guilty of four counts of lewd and lascivious conduct upon a child under the age of fourteen in violation of Penal Code 1 section 288, subdivision (a). Two of the counts alleged a “first” and “last” incident of digital vaginal contact and the other two counts alleged a “first” and “last” incident of penile vaginal contact. The jury was unable to reach agreement on two other charged counts of section 288, subdivision (a), which alleged a “first” and “last” incident of oral genital contact. The trial court declared a mistrial as to the counts…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  5. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Housley v. GodinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. People v. Armstrong CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. People v. Hargis CA5California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. Rew CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Sacramento County Department of Health & Human Services v. Kelly E.California Court of Appeal · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API