Legal Opinion

Sacramento County Department of Health & Human Services v. Kelly E.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 2006No. C046784Published

1Opinion of the Court

*400Opinion

SCOTLAND, P. J.

This is an appeal run amok. Not only does the appeal lack merit, the opening brief is a textbook example of what an appellate brief should not be.

In 76,235 words, rambling and ranting over the opening brief’s 202 pages, appellant’s counsel has managed to violate rules of court; ignore standards of review; misrepresent the record; base arguments on matters not in the record on appeal; fail to support arguments with any meaningful analysis and citation to authority; raise an issue that is not cognizable in an appeal by her client; unjustly challenge the integrity of the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. CudjoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. GuruleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API