Brickel v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
District Court, D. Wyoming
1Opinion of the Court
KERR, Judge.
This motion for summary judgment turns on whether or not the issues raised in the case at bar have already been litigated and previously determined by a jury verdict and judgment entered thereon in civil action No. 4221. A brief summary of the two actions shows the legal relationship of the parties with respect to the status of some 750 tons of alleged mineral ores. There is no dispute about the identity of the parties and subject matter. They are the same in both suits.
Civil action No. 4221 was removed to this court from the State District Court, Sixth Judicial District, Weston…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Norman Tobacco & Candy Company, Inc. v. Gillette Safety Razor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Joseph Aguilar Gaitan and Dolores Marie Gaitan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Vinson v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Locke v. MoultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lane Co. Ex Rel. Lane v. Busch Development, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983