Legal Opinion

State v. Swartzentruber

Wadsworth Municipal Court

Decided December 11, 1989No. 11413PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames L. Kimbler, J.

This cause is before the court on a motion to dismiss. The defendant, Jacob Swartz-entruber, claims tht R.C. 1531.02, as applied to him, is unconstitutional. That section makes it a crime to violate an administrative regulation adopted by the Division of Wildlife. Ohio Adm. Code 1501:31-15-02(U) requires that deer hunters wear “hunter orange” while deer hunting with guns. Violation of this rule is a violation of R.C. 1531.02. It is a fourth degree misdemeanor, punishable by up to thirty days in jail and a fine up to $250.

On November 29, 1988, the defendant was deer hunting with a gun on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. State ex rel. Corrigan v. SeminatoreOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. City of Cincinnati v. CorrellOhio Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  2. State v. BontragerOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API