State v. Swartzentruber
Wadsworth Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtJames L. Kimbler, J.
This cause is before the court on a motion to dismiss. The defendant, Jacob Swartz-entruber, claims tht R.C. 1531.02, as applied to him, is unconstitutional. That section makes it a crime to violate an administrative regulation adopted by the Division of Wildlife. Ohio Adm. Code 1501:31-15-02(U) requires that deer hunters wear “hunter orange” while deer hunting with guns. Violation of this rule is a violation of R.C. 1531.02. It is a fourth degree misdemeanor, punishable by up to thirty days in jail and a fine up to $250.
On November 29, 1988, the defendant was deer hunting with a gun on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State ex rel. Corrigan v. SeminatoreOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Cincinnati v. CorrellOhio Supreme Court · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Armstrong v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- State v. BontragerOhio Court of Appeals · 1996