State v. Bontrager
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Shaw, Judge.
Defendant-appellant brings this appeal from the judgment and sentence of the Hardin County Municipal Court following a no contest plea in which defendant was found guilty of violating Ohio Adm.Code 1501:31-15-11(D), the failure to wear hunter orange while hunting during the deer gun-hunting season. Also charged at the same time was defendant’s brother.
Defendant is a member of the Old Order Amish faith in Hardin County, Ohio. On November 28, 1994, defendant was hunting on his father’s farmland during the deer gun-hunting season without wearing a hunter-orange-colored hat, cap,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- O'Lone v. Estate of ShabazzSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Armstrong v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- In re MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- State v. BlackmonOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. ChapmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re Z.S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.