Legal Opinion
Arnold v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 21, 1925No. 3463PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlschuler, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). We will address ourselves to considering seriatim the specific errors alleged, and elaborated in the brief and argument for plaintiff in error.
1. “It was reversible error for the District Court to overrule the defendant’s challenge of the juror Truman Bjorn for cause.” This juror at one stage of his examination said that from newspaper articles he had formed an impression of tlio case which it might take evidence to remove. But on examination by the court ho stated that, while the newspaper articles naturally created an impression on his mind, and that one…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Stroud v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Spies v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Hopt v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. FeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- United States v. CullenDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1969
- Cravens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Stunz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Hyney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.