Sporting Goods Distributors, Inc. v. Whitney
District Court, N.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
HIGBY, District Judge.
Sporting Goods seeks to enforce an Alabama judgment against Whitney, to recover money allegedly advanced to Whitney pursuant to an employment contract, and to recover the value of goods Whitney allegedly kept when his employment with Sporting Goods terminated. Theories advanced are breach of contract, that the money and goods are due on account, that they were a loan, and that keeping the goods was a conversion. In addition to asking for payment of the money due and the goods’ value, Sporting Goods in its conversion count seeks…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Simmons v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. BaileyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
- Brooks v. InlowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Country Manors Ass'n, Inc. v. Master Antenna Systems, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Johnston v. Frank E. Basil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.