Fraser v. Copake Lake Pure Ice Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHagarty, J.
This is a motion to vacate an attachment, and is the second made in this action. The first motion, made upon the *458papers upon which the attachment was granted, attacked the sufficiency of both causes of action set forth in the complaint. Mr. Justice Dike granted the motion to vacate as to the first cause of action but denied it as to the second (127 Misc. 810). This motion is made upon affidavits setting forth facts which have occurred since the decision made by Mr. Justice Dike. The defendant contends that it is being sued as a joint tort feasor with one Norris, or that it is but secondarily…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Barber v. EllingwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Fraser v. Copake Lake Pure Ice Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rose v. SpragueCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- In re the Estate of BlakeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966
- Latoni v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1958