Legal Opinion

Hollimon v. McGregor

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 25, 1932No. 8 Div. 430PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Plaintiff, appellee here, stated his case against the defendant in two counts. The first count is in detinue, seeking the recovery of a particularly described Nash automobile, while the second count is in trover, for the conversion of said car by the defendant.

At the time the suit was brought, the defendant was in the possession of the car. It appears from the evidence in the case that one Pete Cornelius at one time owned the car. The plaintiff claimed title to the car under an instrument in writing, in form and recital a mortgage alleged to have been executed by Pete Cornelius and his wife…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cooper v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Jackson, Morris & Co. v. RutherfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Gafford v. StearnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
  4. Rees v. CoatsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Russell v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Friedman v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Thomas v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  4. First Nat. Bank of Stevenson v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Hooper v. BrittAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API