Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Check Recovery Systems, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 21, 2007No. Nos. C05-04993 MJJ, C06-02037 MJJPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASS
JENKINS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Before the Court is Plaintiffs Brandy Hunt (“Hunt”) and Brian Castillo’s (“Castillo”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion to Certify Class.1 Defendant Imperial Merchant Services d.b.a. Check Recovery Systems (“Defendant” or “Imperial”) opposes the motion. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Class.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
A. Procedural History
Hunt and Castillo filed their complaints on December 5, 2005 and March 16, 2006, respectively. On May 9, 2006, this Court issued a Related…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Horton v. Usaa Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- Schuchardt v. Law Office of ClarkDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- In re Live Concert Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Bellinghausen v. Tractor Supply Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Senne v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.