Legal Opinion

Hieb v. Opp

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1990No. 16667PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

This action arises from a contract for the installation and construction of a sewage system to service a new home constructed in rural Eureka, South Dakota. Floyd Opp (Opp) was the owner of the property and he entered into the contract with Stanley Hieb (Hieb). After completion of the house, difficulties arose with the sewer system, as a result of which Opp refused to pay the balance on the contract. Hieb brought suit for the balance due on the contract and Opp counterclaimed for damages alleging deficient performance on the contract. The trial court dismissed both claims upon the grounds…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hartpence v. Youth Forestry CampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Norbeck & Nicholson Co. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  4. State Ex Rel. Meierhenry v. Spiegel, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Reid v. Huron Board of EducationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. KaiserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Hanson v. Brookings HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Schroeder v. Department of Social ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Bruggeman v. South Dakota Chemical Dependency Counselor Certification BoardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Porter v. PorterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API