Hall v. Ratliff
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to judgment of Circuit Court of Buchanan county, rendered September 27, 1894, upon a motion wherein the defendant in error was plaintiff, and the plaintiffs in error were defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.
A county treasurer has the right to proceed by motion, upon notice, in the County Court against his deputy and his sureties for the deputy’s failure to pay over the proceeds of, or to account for, tax tickets placed in his hands for collection. Code 1887, sections 910 and 912.
In such motion the notice required is ten days. Code, section 3209.
The motion in this case was under sections 910 and 912, and not under 3211: The County Court, therefore, properly overruled the motion of the defendant to strike the case from the docket, because the notice of the motion was not executed fifteen days, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bunch's Ex'or v. Fluvanna CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
- M'Michen v. AmosCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1826
- Smith v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
- Wynn v. HeningerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1886
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
- Whitley v. Booker Brick Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1912
- Briggs v. CookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1901
- Dickens v. Radford-Willis Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. BealeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.