Legal Opinion

Martin v. Lilly

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 12, 1986No. 82-132-AppealPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERGER, Justice.

This case comes before us on the appeal of Dean Auto Body, Inc. (Dean), from a judgment entered in the Superior Court in favor of the plaintiffs. We affirm the judgment. The facts and background of the case are as follows.

On June 20, 1972, two cars collided at an intersection in Providence. In one car, owned by George B. Bibeault (George), were Beatrice Bibeault (Beatrice), George’s wife, and Karen Martin (Karen), the driver. The other car was driven by Maria Lilly (Maria) and allegedly owned by Dean. As a result of this accident, three actions for damages were…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hood v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  2. Thomas v. Amway Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
  3. Martin v. EstrellaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  4. Marandola v. Hillcrest Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  5. Young v. ParkSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Grady v. Narragansett Electric Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  2. State v. HallenbeckSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  3. Hennessey v. PyneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  4. DiLuglio v. Providence Auto Body, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  5. Lennon v. Dacomed Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API