Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on CE B N Y T R ACC L D I SSS T R I C T O

District Court, C.D. California

Decided April 10, 2018No. 2:18-cv-02970Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL 44//99//1188 on CE B N Y T : R _ ACC__ L _ D __ I _ SSS_ T _ R _ I _ C __ T __ O _ F _ _ C _ A D L E I P F U O T R Y NIA MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Agans, et al; V Uber Technologies Inc, et al; CV18-2970-PSG(GJSx) IN RE: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION MDL No. 2826 TRANSFER ORDER Before the Panel:* Plaintiffs in one action in the Northern District of California move under

28 U.S.C. § 1407

to centralize this litigation in that district. This litigation currently consists of 10 actions pending in five districts,1 as listed on Schedule A. Since…

2Cases cited6 opinions

In Re Kauffman Mutual Fund ActionsUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972
In re Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
In re Fluoroquinolone Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015
In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Salespractices & Products Liability Litigation (No. II)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
In re Sonic Corp. Customer Data Security Breach LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.