Legal Opinion

People v. Brannen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1912No. Docket No. 136PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Oakland; Smith, J. Hugh J. Brannen was convicted of being the father of an illegitimate child.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

In bastardy proceedings respondent was convicted by a jury. A motion for a new trial was denied. No judgment has been entered. Respondent assigned errors and settled a bill of exceptions, which is brought into this court by writ of error.

A writ of error lies in any case only to review a judgment. Aside from this, the practice in such cases has been misconceived. We are aware that in one, and, perhaps, in more than one, case the proceeding appears to have been reviewed upon writ of error; no notice being taken of the use of the writ. See Hull v. People, 41 Mich. 167 (2 N. W. 175).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cross v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Hull v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. People v. SwansonMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API