Legal Opinion

Oliver Farm Equipment Co. v. Foster

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 5, 1932No. 29,873PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*655The opinion of the court was delivered by

Sloan, J.:

This was an action to recover on an oral agreement. The plaintiff prevailed, and the defendants appeal.

The action was originally brought by the appellee and Andrew Tucker. The appellee is the successor in ownership of all the assets of the Hart-Parr Company, and assumed its liabilities. The defendants, Charles E. Foster and A. M. Bates, were copartners doing business under the firm name of Foster & Bates. The Lough Development Company owned a large tract of irrigated lands in Scott county devoted, in part, to the raising of potatoes. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. OsburnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. Mickens v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gates v. GatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  2. Phœnix Mutual Life Insurance v. Central States Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  3. City of Leavenworth v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Myers v. Kansas Stone Products Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  5. Hays House, Inc. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API