Hemphill v. Hemphill
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Bracken, J. P. (dissenting).
The Supreme Court’s resolution of the present child custody dispute constitutes an improvident exercise of discretion, if not an error as a matter of law. The practical effect of the order under review would be to remove two children from their father, as well as from their extended family here in the United States, and to send them to London, England, where they would reside permanently in the household of their mother’s second husband. Since there are no "exceptional circumstances” which warrant this radical disruption in the children’s lives, I conclude that the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Weiss v. WeissNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Daghir v. DaghirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Daghir v. DaghirNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Kozak v. KozakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Meier v. MeierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.