E-Z Roll Off, LLC v. County of Oneida
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtHoover, P.J.
¶ 1. E-Z Roll Off, LLC, appeals a judgment dismissing its complaint for failure to provide Oneida County a timely notice of injury and claim as required by Wis. Stat. § 893.80(1). E-Z Roll Off primarily argues its Wis. Stat. ch. 133 antitrust claim was exempt from the statutory notice requirements. If not exempt, then E-Z Roll Off contends its notice was timely because there was a continuing violation. As its final alternative, E-Z Roll Off asserts Oneida County had actual notice and was not prejudiced by the failure to give the statutory notice. We agree ch. 133 antitrust claims are exempt…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Auchinleck v. Town of LaGrangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. CastilloWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- State Department of Natural Resources v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- E-Z Roll Off, LLC v. County of OneidaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- E-Z Roll Off, LLC v. County of OneidaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011