Legal Opinion
In re Christine M.
New York City Family Court
Decided December 21, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gloria M. Dabiri, J.
By petition dated January 24, 1991 it is alleged that the subject child Christine M., age 3 (date of birth Sept. 26, 1988), is a neglected child within the meaning of Family Court Act § 1012 (i) in that "the respondent [Neil M.] refuses to have Christine immunized in accordance with the recommendations of a physician at Brookdale [sic] Hospital. The doctor’s recommendation was predicated on an outbreak of a measles [or] epidemic which places Christine in danger of contracting the disease in the absence of an immunization. The respondent refuses to have…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- KEMP EX REL. WRIGHT v. State, County of BurlingtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- In re Araynah B.New York City Family Court · 2011
- Nassau County Department of Social Services v. R.B.New York City Family Court · 2008