Legal Opinion

People v. Kneiling

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1932No. Docket No. 2193PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, Acting P. J.

Upon charges of arson and burning insured property the appellant was found guilty by a jury. He was also charged with having previously been convicted of a felony and of having served a sentence therefor, which latter charge he admitted. He appealed from the judgments entered upon said verdicts and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

The sole ground assigned for a reversal consists of a criticism of the sufficiency of the evidence, it being earnestly contended that the evidence was entirely circumstantial. It appeared that the appellant resided upon the premises which were burned,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. NagyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. People v. FlorisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. People v. LepkojesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. People v. LatonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. People v. SchneiderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. People v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API