Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Pure Oil Co. of the Carolinas

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 14, 1939No. 14900PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. G. Duncan Bellinger, Acting Associate Justice.

The respondent’s complaint contains two separate causes of action demanding in each of them $50,000.00 damages on account of certain alleged slanderous statements made of and concerning the respondent by the appellant C. C. Ingram, while in the employ of his co-appellant Pure Oil Company of the Carolinas. Erom the rendition of verdict against each appellant on each cause of action, the appellants bring this appeal.

At proper times the appellants moved for a nonsuit' and directed verdict on both causes of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Robison v. Atl. Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  2. Courtney v. American Ry. Express Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  3. Turner v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  4. Worrell v. South Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  5. Horne v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Duckworth v. First National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  2. Johnson v. LIFE INS. CO. OF GEORGIASupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  3. Taylor v. Jones Bros. Bakery, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Wardlaw v. PeckCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Sandifer v. Electrolux Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API