Neal v. Ahitow
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MeDADE, District Judge.
Before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration. (Doc. # 17). For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner’s motion is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
On July 7, 1997, Petitioner, Quinton Neal, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. #3). On January 8, 1998, Respondent, Rodney Ahitow, filed a Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. # 9). In his motion, Respondent argued that Petitioner’s ha-beas corpus petition was barred by the one-year limitations period found in 28 U.S.C. § 2244. The Court agreed and on April 28,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Steven R. Lovasz v. Scig Supt. Donald T. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. DeTellaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- United States v. OwenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- Lott v. CoyleDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dale Swartz v. Meyers, Superintendent Pennsylvania Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Elmore J. Williams v. Burl CainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Hudson v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- Matthews v. AbramajtysDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- Rice v. TrippettDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.