Legal Opinion

Matter of Guardianship, Boyd & Nickolas Faust

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1960No. 41523PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

This case raises issues pertaining to the parental right to control the education and religious training of minor children. We hold that here the chancery court, an agency of the State, acted beyond its powers in directing and restricting the father in his right to control their intellectual and religious education, where he was a fit person for their custody.

Appellant, N. M. Faust, is the father of Boyd Quin Faust and Nickolas L. Faust, who, at the time of the decree appealed from, were 15 and 14 years of age, respectively. Their mother died in 1953, and appellant was appointed guardian over…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pass v. PassMississippi Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Sinquefield v. ValentineMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Bryant v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Denton v. JamesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. Nickle v. BurnettMississippi Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re J. P.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Stacy v. RossMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Vockroth v. VockrothMississippi Supreme Court · 1967
  4. McIntosh v. MeyerMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Delaine Stacy v. Willard Kenneth RossMississippi Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API