Legal Opinion

Covington v. Case Threshing Machine Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 2, 1921No. 12169PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Foreclosure of mortgage; from city court of Bainbridge — Judge'Spooner. January 10, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

1. To entitle a party to a continuance under § 5717 of the Code of 1910, which provides: “If either party shall be providentially prevented from attending at the trial of any cause, and the counsel of such absent party will state in his place that he cannot go safely to trial without the presence of such absent party, such cause shall be continued, provided his continuances are not exhausted,” evidence of some character, under oath, must be presented that the absent party was in fact “providentially prevented from attending at the trial.” A statement by counsel of the absent party in this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'Barr v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
  2. Cavender v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stanley v. AmosCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. Smith v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  3. McLendon v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Arnold v. PinesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  5. Dyar v. DyarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API