Legal Opinion
Purcell v. Doherty
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 7, 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Alexander Chananau, J.
Motion by defendants Doherty and Gelco Corporation, pursuant to CPLR 4533-b and section 15-108 of the General Obligations Law and cross motion for same relief by defendants Patricia and Assaunta Delgado, to reduce a jury verdict of $775,000 against said defendants by $150,000 (the amount of a settlement agreed upon between other codefendants [McKay and Gannon] and plaintiff prior to the verdict), are consolidated for disposition and disposed of as follows.
In this personal injury action tried before me, plaintiff suffered injuries as a result of an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lucio v. CurranNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Mielcarek v. KnightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Abernethy v. AzzoniNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Werner v. Our Lady of LourdesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Bellamy v. PrimeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
3Cited by7 opinions
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Williams v. NiskeNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Minpeco, S.A. v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Westwood Chemical Co., Inc. v. KulickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Kiss v. JacobNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.