Legal Opinion

Mielcarek v. Knights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 12, 1975PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCardamone, J.

*124QUESTION PRESENTED

The sole question to be determined upon this appeal is whether one tort-feasor who has settled with and obtained a release from the plaintiff, and as to whom the plaintiff is willing to discontinue, is entitled to an order of discontinuance; or is he required to attend and participate as a party defendant in the trial of the action against the remaining defendant tort-feasors.

STATUTE

The controlling statute is section 15-108 of the General Obligations Law the amendment of which in 1974 (L 1974, ch 742) became effective September 1, 1974. It provides that when a release is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Blass v. HennesseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Rosado v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. County of Westchester v. Welton Becket AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Apple v. Jewish Hospital & Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. In Re Eastern & Southern Districts Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  5. Apple v. Jewish HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API