Legal Opinion
In re Kaplan
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided May 19, 1930No. 2860PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ATWELL, District Judge.
Oral argument not being desired by either party, the court has given careful consideration to the question presented, which is:
The bankrupt contracted to hold harmless Max Ohringer from any losses that might result on sales of Ohringer’s goods made by the bankrupt.
On August 7, 1929, and on October 8, 1929, Kaplan sold goods to the Dixie Stores in Oklahoma. The aggregate sales were $2,541.74. The August invoices fixed the terms of the sale as payable in ten days with discount from the end of October, which would be about, November 10th. The terms of the October sales…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Zavelo v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Dunbar v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Moch v. Market St. Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1901
- First Nat. Bank of Pikeville v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re LehrenkraussDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1936