The Marie Palmer
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
In Admiralty. Suits for collision by the schooner Marie Palmer and the schooner Blanche Hopkins, respectively, against the tug James McCaulley. On exceptions to report of commissioner.
1Opinion of the Court
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
In these two actions, which are founded on the collision between the schooner Marie Palmer, in tow of the tug James McCaulley, and the schooner Blanche Hopkins, the tug was adjudged to be solely at fault ([D. C.] 155 Fed. 894), and the ascertainment of the damages was referred to a commissioner, whose report is now before me upon exceptions. His examination of the questions presented to his consideration was unusually careful and painstaking, and his findings of fact are conceded to be unexceptionable. Indeed, his report is so convincing upon several important…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- New Haven Steam-Boat Co. v. MayorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1888
- Fisk v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1902
- The Marie PalmerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1907
- Carr v. Austin & N. W. R.United States Circuit Court · 1882
3Cited by2 opinions
- The NantasketDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1923
- The James McCaudleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910