Legal Opinion

Mediclaim, Inc. v. Groothuis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 20, 2007PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover payment due under the terms of a *731mortgage note agreement and certain guarantees, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Dunne, J.), dated December 23, 2005, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied, as academic, its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the defendants’ affirmative defense of champerty pursuant to Judiciary Law § 489.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Beltrone v. General Schuyler & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Panish v. RudolphAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sterling Savings Bank v. Emerald Development Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Kalikow v. ShalikNew York Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Harry Spring Consulting LLC v. EstersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  4. Harry Spring Consulting LLC v. EstersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  5. Terracino v. Gordon and HillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API