Legal Opinion

ARRM v. Piper

District Court, D. Maine

Decided June 28, 2018No. Case No. 18–cv–1627 (WMW/BRT)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs now seek a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. The Commissioner opposes Plaintiffs' motion, arguing that the Individual Plaintiffs lack standing and that Plaintiffs have not established that they are entitled to preliminary injunctive relief.

ANALYSIS

I. Standing

The Commissioner argues that the Individual Plaintiffs lack standing to seek injunctive relief because they have not alleged an imminent injury in fact. The Court addresses this issue first because questions of standing implicate the Court's subject-matter jurisdiction. Faibisch v. Univ. of Minn. , 304…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. Pulliam v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC. v. BOOCKVARDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API