Legal Opinion
GME Consultants, Inc. v. Oak Grove Development, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 19, 1994No. C5-93-2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
GME Consultants, Inc. and CCST, Inc. challenge the exemption of Independent School District No. 200 from Minnesota’s mechanics’ lien statute, Minn.Stat. § 514.01 (1992). We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Independent School District No. 200 owned a parcel of undeveloped real property in Hastings, Minnesota. It leased the property to a farmer. On April 17,1991, the school district entered into a contingent purchase agreement for the sale of approximately 20 acres of that property to a commercial developer, respondent Oak Grove Enterprises, Inc. (Oak Grove). The written purchase…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. HannukselaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Johnson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- R. E. Short Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- North Bay Construction Inc. v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Comstock & Davis, Inc. v. City of Eden PrairieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Minnesota School Board Ass'n Insurance Trust v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2001