Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1987No. 52683PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMON, Judge.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

Movant was convicted by a jury of two counts of capital murder and was sentenced to death on each count. The Supreme Court affirmed the conviction in State v. Gilmore, 697 S.W.2d 172 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1178, 106 S.Ct. 2906, 90 L.Ed.2d 992 (1986). Movant filed a pro se Rule 27.26 motion. His appointed counsel filed an amended motion on movant’s behalf. Any reference to the motion herein refers to the amended motion.

The facts of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. State v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. Cheadle v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. State v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Malone v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. State v. BerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Hood v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Gilmore v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API