Bank of Omega v. Ford
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Tifton—Judge Price. February 13, 1917.
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, P. J.
1. A surety upon a promissory note secretly infected with usury, of which he had no knowledge, is discharged from liability if the note contains a waiver of homestead. Lewis v. Brown, 89 Ga. 115 (14 S. E. 881) ; Harrington v. Findley, 89 Ga. 385 (15 S. E. 483); Howard v. Johnson, 91 Ga. 319 (18 S. E. 132) ; Prather v. Smith, 101 Ga. 283 (28 S. E. 857) ; Hancock v. Bank of Tifton, 6 Ga. App. 678 (65 S. E. 784) ; Morris v Reed, 14 Ga. App. 729 (5) (82 S. E. 314) ; Denton v. Butler, 99 Ga. 264 (25 S. E. 624).(a) In an action on such a note, where the usury is shown, it is incumbent upon the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Howard v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Prather v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Denton v. Butler & StevensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Morris v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Harrington v. FindleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lott v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Middlebrooks v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929