Legal Opinion

Cesarini v. United States

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 17, 1969No. C 67-65PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, District Judge.

This is an action by the plaintiffs as taxpayers for the recovery of income tax payments made in the calendar year 1964. Plaintiffs contend that the amount of $836.51 was erroneously overpaid by them in 1964, and that they are entitled to a refund in that amount, together with the statutory interest from October 13, 1965, the date which they made their claim upon the Internal Revenue Service for the refund.

Plaintiffs and the United States have stipulated to the material facts in the case, and the matter is before the Court for final decision. The facts necessary for a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Douglas v. WillcutsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Irwin v. GavitSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Helvering v. Midland Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ermenegildo Cesarini and Mary C. Cesarini v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  2. CollinsUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  3. Planned v. AyotteDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008
  4. Theriault v. New Direction IRA, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2025
  5. Wallace v. New Direction IRA, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API