Legal Opinion
Hilberg v. Greer
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided November 8, 1912No. Docket No. 1PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from Oakland; Smith, J. Bill by George J. Hilberg and Emory J. Doerr against Charles H. Greer and Elizabeth Greer for specific performance of an option for the sale of land. From an order sustaining a demurrer to complainants’ bill, complainants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.
Complainants filed their bill of complaint to enforce the specific performance of the following written option:
“Pontiac, Mich., Apr. 21, 1910.
“For and in consideration of the sum of one dollar, I hereby give to Hilberg & Doerr an option on building and lot known as No. 20 South Saginaw St., Pontiac, Mich., for a period of sixty days. Purchase price to be five thousand five hundred dollars. Int. 5% easy terms.
“Charles H. Greer.”
*506The bill avers that, after this option was signed and delivered to complainants, the parties met by agreement at the office of A. L. Moore, in Pontiac, for the purpose…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gault v. StormontMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Ebert v. CullenMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Wadleigh v. Marathon County BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by8 opinions
- Windiate v. LelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Reh v. ErtrachterMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Benedek v. Mechanical Products, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Cochran v. StamanMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Rogers v. RoopCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.