Eric Ramone Sharkey v. State of Mississippi
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Concurrence
MAXWELL, JUSTICE, SPECIALLY CONCURRING:
¶30. The majority is correct that there is no reversible error. But I write separately to address the propriety of both the State and the defendant probing potential jurors about their biases and preconceived views of accomplice guilty pleas. I suggest such inquiries are within the trial judge's discretion when an accomplice has pled guilty and is expected to testify. 3
¶31. It is obvious to our bench and bar that criminal practice has changed tremendously in recent years. Gone are the days of demurrers and slews of much simpler one count, one defendant…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Fuselier v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- King v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. LundgrenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. Lawrence Charles KingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Scott v. BallMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.