Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Temple v. Davison Chemical Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 30, 1943No. 29983Published

1ConcurrenceFelton, J.

On demurrer pleadings are construed against the pleader. One can not be the “holder” of a negotiable instrument, in the legal sense of the word, unless it comes into his hands as an unconditional, prima facie enforceable obligation of the party executing it. Code, § 14-102, catchword “holder.” The note sued on is a negotiable instrument and the defendant admitted in his answer that the plaintiff was the holder thereof in order to be entitled to the opening and concluding argument. Such admission was a necessary prerequisite to such a right. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Brewton v. Brantley, 20…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fowler v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Thompson v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Kirkpatrick v. FawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  4. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. BrantleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API