Legal Opinion

Keilman, Tr. v. City of Hammond

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 1953No. 18,445PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoyse, J.

Appellant is the owner of certain improvement bonds (commonly known as Barrett Law Bonds) issued by the City of Hammond. He brought this action against appellee to recover monies paid to appellee by property owners to be applied by it to the payment of his bonds.

Appellant’s complaint was in four paragraphs. For the purpose of deciding the question presented herein each contains the same averments. After averring the bonds were regularly issued, the complaint is, in part, as follows:

“Plaintiff further alleges that bonds were issued in anticipation of said assessment collections in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of North Vernon v. VoeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Board of Commissioners v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Wayne Works v. Hicks Body Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. City of Fort Wayne v. HamiltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Moody v. Provident Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. French v. Hickman Moving & StorageIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Merritt v. Economy Department Store, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Scates v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Lightle v. Harcourt Management Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Newsom v. ESTATE OF HAYTHORN, DCSD.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API