Legal Opinion

People v. Continental Casualty Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 1950PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConway, J.

There is presented to us by this appeal the question whether the facts submitted to Special Term on the motion made to it for the remission of the forfeiture of bail of one Knapp permitted the exercise of any discretion in favor of the corporate surety.

Knapp and two others, Carroll and Smith, had been indicted for the crimes of extortion, grand larceny in the first degree, attempted extortion, attempted grand larceny in the second degree and personating public officer. Thereafter Knapp was admitted to bail on a recognizance conditioned in the sum of $3,500. The case was set for trial for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. ParkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. People v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  3. People v. Rigby, Continental Casualty CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. People v. HandelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. O'Dowd v. American Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. People v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. FiannacaNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. People v. Peerless InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  5. Allegheny Mutual Casualty Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API