Council 13, American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees ex rel. Fillman v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Saylor
I join Parts I, II, and 111(A) of the majority opinion, as I agree with the holdings that the present controversy is justiciable and that the FLSA and its wage provisions apply to the Commonwealth by virtue of Garcia v. San Antonio Metro. Transit Auth., 469 U.S. 528, 105 S.Ct. 1005, 83 L.Ed.2d 1016 (1985). I respectfully disagree, however, with the majority’s conclusion that the FLSA absolutely requires the Commonwealth to pay wages in a timely manner, without consideration of the existence of a budgetary impasse and the resulting fiscal limitations imposed by Article III, Section 24. See…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Crispin Calderon, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Jim Witvoet, Sr., Doing Business as J & B VegetablesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Council 13 v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008