Legal Opinion
Consolidated Gas Co. of Florida v. City Gas Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 6, 1984No. 82-2676PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
We affirm the judgment under review entered in favor of City Gas Company of-Florida upon holdings that (1) the agreement between the developer and Consolidated Gas Company of Florida, which (a) gave to Consolidated “an exclusive franchise” to “install and maintain gas tanks, gas lines, appliances and appurtenances” in the developed subdivision did not create an easement or property right in the land enforceable by Consolidated against City Gas Company, see Colen v. Sunhaven Homes, Inc., 98 So.2d 501 (Fla.1957); Leonard v. Baylen Street Wharf Co., 59 Fla. 547, 52 So. 718 (1910); St. Joe…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Leonard v. Baylen Street Wharf Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1910
- Colen v. Sunhaven Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1957
- North Dade Water Co. v. Florida State Turnpike Auth.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Holbrook v. TelesioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Consolidated Gas Company of Florida, Inc. v. City Gas Company of Florida, a Florida CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Stephens v. DobbinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Cheshire Hunt, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Cheshire Hunt, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022