Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 10, 1930No. Gen. No. 33,853PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hebel

The claim of the plaintiff is for 5385% hours overtime services rendered as a laborer for the defendant, the City of Chicago, from the first day of August, 1923, to the first day of September, 1927, when the plaintiff was discharged, which overtime is over and above the eight hours constituting a day’s work, and the total of said escess time is to be paid for at 1% times the daily wage earned; that during the time he was employed there was in full force apd effect an ordinance of the City of Chicago, sections 3276 and 3277, entitled, “Hours of Labor,” which provides that eight hours of labor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Luske v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
  2. County of Christian v. MerriganIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Sanitary District v. BurkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harris v. City of EdwardsvilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  2. Habryl v. County of CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  3. Kam v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API