Legal Opinion

Grimes v. Shrieve

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 8, 1828Published

Chancery Appeal from the Fayette Circuit: Jesse Bledsoe, Judge. Usury. Leases. Rents. Parol contracts for Land. Improvements.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bibb

The circuit court dismissed Grimes’ bill with costs, and he appealed. ,

The principal question is, whether the transactions between complainant and defendant, grow out of a sale and purchase of the land and mills, by pa-rol, with an agreement for usurious interest cloaked under the form of a written instrument for rent, or a bona fide contract between lessor and lessee, merely for rent. Grimes alleges the, former, Shrieve the latter.

Shrieve had sold a tract of about two hundred and thirty-five acres of second and third rate land to Caldwell, and retained a lien for the purchase money. Grimes…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. M'Campbell v. M'CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1824
  2. Shreve v. GrimesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1823
  3. M'Cracken v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1817
  4. Richardson v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1813
  5. Thompson v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1815

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API